Changes for page Test Speedup
Last modified by chrisby on 2025/03/08 11:39
Summary
-
Page properties (1 modified, 0 added, 0 removed)
Details
- Page properties
-
- Content
-
... ... @@ -20,10 +20,10 @@ 20 20 21 21 **Synchronous Testing** 22 22 23 -A simple TDD workflow is to write new code, runtests locally, wait for them to finish,and if they pass,move on. To avoid long wait times, yourunonly a few very fast tests.Thissfine when you are workingon isolatedcodethatis checkedbynittests,butas soonasintegrationof theewcodewiththeoldcodecomesintoplay, itbecomesaproblem. Nowyouhave two bad choices: eitheryouruna few fast testsand do notusethe full powerofyour testsuite,resulting in low coverage andpossibly missing bugsthatwouldhavebeen easiertofixiftheyhadbeencaught earlier,or you run all thetestslocally and are unproductive foralongtime whilewaiting for them tofinish.Thisproblemcan be solved with asynchronous testing.23 +A simple TDD workflow is to write new code, execute tests locally, wait for them to finish and if they pass then going on. To avoid long waiting times being unproductive, you only execute a few, very fast tests sacrificing that all tests check your latest changes. This is tolerable when working on yet isolated code and working with unit tests but as soon as integration with the rest of the code comes into play this becomes a problem. Eit 24 24 25 25 **Asynchronous Testing** 26 26 27 - When you pushcodeintothe coderepository,there should beaDevOps infrastructurethat triggersa CI pipelinethat runsallthe tests.Thisallowsyourcodetobe extensivelytested whileyou continue to work without waiting.IftheCI pipelinesucceeds,the testsuitehas proventhatyour code changesare okay. Ifthe CI pipeline fails, youshouldreceive a notification, such as an SMS,email, or chat messagethat triggersaring tone, or a desktopnotification, so youcan immediatelystopwhatyou are doing andfix theproblem.Push thefixagain and continueworking without waiting for theteststo finish.27 +is a workflow that works well when the test take a few seconds only. This has the disadvantage that you only check your code changes for correctness against just a few very fast tests. 28 28 29 -It isnotuncommonto havemanyCI pipelinesrunning simultaneouslyfor thesamedeveloper.While thismayrequireadvancedDevOpsinfrastructure,it'softenworththe investment.Oryou cansimplyuse cloudproviders thatdothisautomaticallyinthebackground.29 +Instead of waiting for your tests to finish locally, you should have a DevOps infrastructure which triggers a CI pipeline when pushing the code executing all tests. Doing that enables you to directly go on working without the need to wait minutes for the tests to finish. In case the CI pipeline fails, you should get a notification to fix the CI pipeline immediately. This enables quite comprehensive testing, even having the same testing jobs running in parallel, even long taking ones.