Changes for page Test Speedup
Last modified by chrisby on 2025/03/08 11:39
Summary
-
Page properties (1 modified, 0 added, 0 removed)
Details
- Page properties
-
- Content
-
... ... @@ -20,10 +20,10 @@ 20 20 21 21 **Synchronous Testing** 22 22 23 -A simple TDDworkflow is to write new code,runtests locally, wait for them to finish,and if they pass,move on. To avoid long wait times, yourunonly a few very fast tests.Thisis fine when youare working onisolatedcode which is checked by unit tests, but as soon as integrationofthe new code withthe old code comes into play,itbecomesa problem. Now, You havetwobadchoices:eitheryouunonlyafew fasttestsand do not usethe full power of your testsuite, possiblymissingbugsthat would beeasierto fix if theywere caughtearlier,or you run allthe tests locallyandare unproductivefora longtimewhile waiting forthem to finish.This problem can be solvedwithasynchronoustesting.23 +A simple test-driven workflow is to write new code, execute tests locally, wait for them to finish and if they pass then going on. To avoid long waiting times being unproductive, you only execute a few, very fast tests sacrificing that all tests check your latest changes. This is tolerable when working on an isolated concerns working with unit tests e 24 24 25 25 **Asynchronous Testing** 26 26 27 - when pushingcodeto thecoderepositorythere shouldbeDevOps infrastructurethat triggersa CI pipeline executing all tests.Doingthatenablesyou to getyour codemprehensivelytested while you candirectlygo on workingwithouttheneedto wait. If the CI pipelinesucceeds,the testsuite proofedyourcode to be fineand . If theCI pipeline fails,youshouldgeta notificationlikean SMSorEmail, abort yourcurrentwork immediately to fix the problem. Pushthe fixagainand continueworking withoutwaitingfor anyteststo finish.27 +is a workflow that works well when the test take a few seconds only. This has the disadvantage that you only check your code changes for correctness against just a few very fast tests. 28 28 29 -It is no tunusualthatmanyCI pipelinesrun at thesame time for the samedeveloper.Although thisposesaquite huge29 +Instead of waiting for your tests to finish locally, you should have a DevOps infrastructure which triggers a CI pipeline when pushing the code executing all tests. Doing that enables you to directly go on working without the need to wait minutes for the tests to finish. In case the CI pipeline fails, you should get a notification to fix the CI pipeline immediately. This enables quite comprehensive testing, even having the same testing jobs running in parallel, even long taking ones.