Changes for page 3. Free Software and Open Source Software
Last modified by chrisby on 2025/01/11 10:03
Summary
-
Page properties (1 modified, 0 added, 0 removed)
Details
- Page properties
-
- Content
-
... ... @@ -67,6 +67,6 @@ 67 67 68 68 * Permissive licenses might attract more users, especially vendors, and lead to more voluntary contributions. Copyleft licenses, on the other hand, force improvements to be open sourced and shared with the community. Which effect is greater depends on the situation. 69 69 70 -**Why should people with no technical expertise care about open source? Speakingofpeople who cannot even read the source code.**70 +**Why should people with no technical expertise care about open source? People who cannot even read the source code.** 71 71 72 -* Even if you donothave the expertiseto examineor modify the source code yourself, open source software allowsyouto engagespecialistswho canadaptthe software to meet your needs. You also benefit from the collective work of abroader communitythatimproves the software. In contrast, proprietary offeringscanlimit your control andcreate dependencyon the vendor for updatesor modifications.Fromabusiness perspective,opensourcecan provide long-term benefits,suchasducedriskbyreducingdependenceon a single vendor. Choosingopensourcemay bethe moreeconomicaloption.72 +* Even if you cannot read or modify the source code yourself, open source gives you the ability to hire experts to customize or improve the software to meet your needs. You can also benefit from the contributions and improvements made by the open source community. In contrast, proprietary software limits your control and often makes you dependent on the vendor for updates and changes. Managers should consider the long-term benefits of open source software, such as flexibility, community-driven innovation, and freedom from vendor lock-in.