Wiki source code of Code Example: Data Structure Style vs. Object Style
Show last authors
| author | version | line-number | content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ### Use Cases | ||
| 2 | |||
| 3 | This example is intended to demonstrate the extensibility differences between data structures and objects by extending them with | ||
| 4 | |||
| 5 | 1. an Area() function (extending behavior) | ||
| 6 | 1. a rectangle type (extending data type) | ||
| 7 | |||
| 8 | ### Data Structure Style | ||
| 9 | |||
| 10 | interface GeometricObject {} | ||
| 11 | |||
| 12 | class Square implements GeometricObject { | ||
| 13 | length float | ||
| 14 | } | ||
| 15 | |||
| 16 | class Circle implements GeometricObject { | ||
| 17 | radius float | ||
| 18 | } | ||
| 19 | |||
| 20 | function Circumference(g GeometricObject) float { | ||
| 21 | switch type(g): | ||
| 22 | case Square: | ||
| 23 | return 4 * g.length | ||
| 24 | case Circle: | ||
| 25 | return 2 * PI * g.radius | ||
| 26 | } | ||
| 27 | |||
| 28 | 1. Adding an Area() function with a very similar anatomy to Circumference() is easy because it only requires adding new code. | ||
| 29 | 1. Adding a new datatype, Rectangle, is harder because it requires touching existing code, namely any functions like Circumference() or Area() that need to be enabled handle this datatype. | ||
| 30 | |||
| 31 | #### | ||
| 32 | |||
| 33 | #### Object-Oriented Style | ||
| 34 | |||
| 35 | interface GeometricObject { | ||
| 36 | Circumference() float | ||
| 37 | } | ||
| 38 | |||
| 39 | class Square implements GeometricObject { | ||
| 40 | length float | ||
| 41 | |||
| 42 | constructor(length float) { | ||
| 43 | this.length = length | ||
| 44 | } | ||
| 45 | |||
| 46 | func Circumference() float { | ||
| 47 | return 4 * this.length | ||
| 48 | } | ||
| 49 | } | ||
| 50 | |||
| 51 | class Circle implements GeometricObject { | ||
| 52 | radius float | ||
| 53 | |||
| 54 | constructor(radius float) { | ||
| 55 | this.radius = radius | ||
| 56 | } | ||
| 57 | |||
| 58 | func Circumference() float { | ||
| 59 | return 2 * PI * this.radius | ||
| 60 | } | ||
| 61 | } | ||
| 62 | |||
| 63 | 1. Adding a function Area() to the GeometricObject interface is hard because it requires touching existing code, namely extending all Square and Circle classes with the new function. | ||
| 64 | 1. Adding a new datatype, Rectangle, is easy because only new code is added, namely a Rectangle class. | ||
| 65 | |||
| 66 | ### Conclusion | ||
| 67 | |||
| 68 | * The lesson learned here is that data structures are easy to extend with functions, and objects are easy to extend with data types. | ||
| 69 | * Although the difference between the two styles may seem insignificant in this simplified example, it has serious implications in complex production codebases with multiple data types and behaviors. |