Wiki source code of Deadlock Prevention
Show last authors
author | version | line-number | content |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Deadlocks can only occur if all four specific conditions are met. Therefore, strategies to prevent deadlocks focus on negating one of these conditions. | ||
2 | |||
3 | | ------------------------ | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | | ||
4 | | **Condition** | **Description** | **Solutions** | **Dangers** | | ||
5 | | Mutual Exclusion / Mutex | When resources can't be used by mutual thread and there are less resources than threads. | 1) Use concurrently accessible resources like AtomicInteger. 2) Increase the number of resources until its greater or equal to the number of competing threads. 3 ) Check if every required resource is accessible before the task starts. | | | ||
6 | | Lock & Wait | Once a thread acquires a resource, it will not release the resource until it has acquired all of the other resources it requires and has completed its work. | Before reservation of a resource, check its accessibility. If a resource is not accessible, release every resource and start from anew. | | ||
7 | |||
8 | 1) Starvation: A thread never achieves to reserve all required resources. 2) Livelock: Thread gets tangled up. | ||
9 | |||
10 | These two approach are always applicable but inefficient as it causes a bad performance. | | ||
11 | | | | | | | ||
12 | | | | | | | ||
13 | |||
14 | #### Lock & Wait | ||
15 | |||
16 | * Description: | ||
17 | * Once a thread acquires a resource, it will not release the resource until it has acquired all of the other resources it requires and has completed its work. | ||
18 | * Solutions: | ||
19 | * Before reservation of a resource, check its accessibility. | ||
20 | * If a resource is not accessible, release every resource and start from anew. | ||
21 | * Dangers: | ||
22 | * Starvation: A thread never achieves to reserve all required resources. | ||
23 | * Livelock: Thread gets tangled up.→ This approach is always applicable but inefficient as it causes a bad performance. | ||
24 | |||
25 | #### No preemption | ||
26 | |||
27 | * Description: | ||
28 | * A thread is unable to steal a resources reserved by another thread. | ||
29 | * Solution: | ||
30 | * A thread is allowed to ask another thread to release all of its resources (including the required one) and starting from anew. This approach is similar to the 'Lock & Wait' solution but has a better performance. | ||
31 | |||
32 | #### Circular Waiting / Deadly Embrace | ||
33 | |||
34 | * Description: | ||
35 | * When two or more threads require a resource which is already reserved by another of these threads. | ||
36 | * Example: | ||
37 | * Thread T1 has resource R1 and waits for R2 to be released. | ||
38 | * Thread T2 has resource R2 and waits for R1 to be released. | ||
39 | * Solution: | ||
40 | * All threads reserve all resources in a the same order. | ||
41 | * Problems: | ||
42 | * The order of reservation doesn't necessarily have to be the same as the order of usage. This leads to inefficiencies like reserving a resource at the beginning which is just required at the end of the task. | ||
43 | * Unnecessarily long locked resources. | ||
44 | * Order can not always be specified. |