Changes for page Acceptance Tests
Last modified by chrisby on 2024/05/11 08:20
Summary
-
Page properties (1 modified, 0 added, 0 removed)
Details
- Page properties
-
- Content
-
... ... @@ -8,25 +8,23 @@ 8 8 * **Implementation Timing**: Stories should not wait for acceptance tests to be completed. Ideally, acceptance tests should be started to be written in the previous iteration, but no later than after the IPM, so that they are completed before the story they verify. Since it is not possible to know with certainty which stories will be implemented in the next iteration, testers can ask stakeholders which stories are likely to come next. If acceptance testing is consistently late, QA will need to hire more people. QA and developers should communicate and negotiate the test structure, perhaps even pair programming, instead of the "eat or die" tactic of writing tests without consulting the developer. 9 9 * **Level of Detail**: The business should specify the requirements at a level of detail that is specific enough for the developers to know what to do, but still short and vague enough not to contain details. Acceptance tests are story specification. 10 10 * **Requirement Automation**: Wherever practically feasible, requirements should be written as automated tests. 11 -* **Acceptance Test Anatomy**: Acceptance tests consist of **technical acceptance test code** and can contain **business acceptance test code**. The business acceptance test code is written in Englishand in natural language and, when executed, they run the technical acceptance test code written in a programming language. Acceptance tests are the link between easy-to-understand business requirements and test automation.11 +* **Acceptance Test Anatomy**: Acceptance tests consist of **technical acceptance test code** and can contain **business acceptance test code**. The business acceptance test code is written in natural language (English) and, when executed, they run the technical acceptance test code written in a programming language. Acceptance tests are the link between easy-to-understand business requirements and test automation. 12 12 13 13 ### Sample Acceptance Test 14 14 15 15 Below is the business acceptance test code of a "Login Scenario" written in the "Gherkin" language, which is used, for example, by the Cucumber acceptance testing framework: 16 16 17 -```cucumber 18 -Feature: User Login 19 - In order to access my account 20 - As a user 21 - I want to be able to log in using my credentials 17 + Feature: User Login 18 + In order to access my account 19 + As a user 20 + I want to be able to log in using my credentials 21 + 22 + Scenario: Successful login 23 + Given I am on the login page 24 + When I enter a valid username and password 25 + And I click the login button 26 + Then I should see my dashboard 22 22 23 - Scenario: Successful login 24 - Given I am on the login page 25 - When I enter a valid username and password 26 - And I click the login button 27 - Then I should see my dashboard 28 -``` 29 - 30 30 * **Ease of Comprehension**: As shown above, the technical keywords in business test code are replaced with easy-to-understand ones that allow business people to read and write executable tests. Business acceptance test code should always be available to stakeholders. 31 31 32 32 ### Tester Roles